Praktik Pembagian Harta Waris Terhadap Kerukunan Keluarga Menurut Tokoh Masyarakat Studi Kasus di Desa Campur Kecamatan Gondang Kabupaten Nganjuk

Authors

  • Hafidhul Umami STAI Darusslam Nganjuk
  • Umi Chamidatus Sholichah STAI Darussalam Nganjuk

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65356/usratuna.v9i1.931

Abstract

This study examines the practice of inheritance distribution and its impact on family harmony from the perspective of community leaders in Campur Village, Gondang District, Nganjuk Regency. Normatively, Islamic inheritance law (farāʾiḍ) regulates the distribution of inheritance in detail based on the Qur’an and Hadith. However, in social practice, the people of Campur Village tend not to apply the farāʾiḍ system in a pure form, instead adopting customary and family-based distribution with an equal-sharing principle. This research employs a descriptive qualitative approach with a field research method, utilizing interviews and observations involving local community leaders. The findings indicate that the main reason for the non-implementation of Islamic inheritance law is the community’s perception that farāʾiḍ-based distribution is considered unfair and has the potential to trigger family conflict. Community leaders believe that customary distribution is more effective in maintaining harmony, peace, and family unity. From the perspective of Islamic law, such practices cannot be fully classified as valid ‘urf, yet they may be justified provided that all heirs are aware of their respective legal shares and mutually agree to a peaceful settlement, as stipulated in Article 183 of the Compilation of Islamic Law. This study highlights the importance of the role of religious and community leaders in providing a comprehensive understanding of justice in Islamic inheritance law in order to bridge the gap between normative legal justice and social perceptions of justice within society.

References

Djailani, Abdul Qodir. Keluarga Sakinah. Surabaya: Bina Ilmu, 1995, 57. Yang dikutip oleh Agus Efendi dalam skripsinya yang berjudul Pembagian Warisan Secara Kekeluargaan Studi Terhadap Pasal 183 Kompilasi Hukum Islam.

Doi, Rahman I. Penjelasan Lengkap Hukum-hukum Allah. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2002.

Efendi, Agus. dalam skripsinya yang berjudul Pembagian Warisan Secara Kekeluargaan (Studi Kasus Terhadap Pasal 183 Kompilasi Hukum Islam).

Fathurahman, Pupuh. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Badung: CV. Pustaka setia, 2011.

Gunawan, Imam. Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2013.

Hadisalim, Ahmad Nur. Sekretris Desa Campur. Wawancara Via Telepon. 14 Maret 2019.

Hartoyo. Ketua RT Wilayah Dusun Pulo. Wawancara Langsung. 24 Maret 2019.

Huda, Miftahul. Membangun Model Bernegoisasi dalam Skripsi Winda Amalia Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Darussalam 2018.

Kusnadi, Edi Dan Dadan Iskandar. Peran Tokoh Masyarakat Dalam Membangun Partisipasi Kewargaan Pemuda Karang Taruna. Bandung: t.p., 2017.

Kusumo, Hilman. Hukum Waris Adat. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1990. Yang dikutip oleh Agus Effendi dalam skripsinya yang bejudul Pembagian Warisan Secara Kekeluargaan Studi Terhadap Pasal 183 Kompilasi Hukum Islam, 2009.

Mahfud, Kamituwo Desa Campur. Wawancara Langsung 22 Maret 2019.

Margono, Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2014.

Mas’ud, Ibnu dan Zainal Abidin, Fiqih Madzhab Syafi’i 2. Bandung: Pustaka Setia, 2007.

Mashari, Kiyai Desa Campur. Wawancara Langsung 24 Maret 2019.

Moleong, Lexy J. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosda Karya, 2014.

Muhibbin, Moh dan Abdul Wahid. Hukum Kewarisan Islam. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2011.

Narbuko, H. Abu Achmadi, Cholid. Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2002.

Nata, Abuddin. Metodologi Studi Islam. Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada, 2013.

Downloads

Published

24-12-2025

How to Cite

Umami, H., & Sholichah , U. C. (2025). Praktik Pembagian Harta Waris Terhadap Kerukunan Keluarga Menurut Tokoh Masyarakat Studi Kasus di Desa Campur Kecamatan Gondang Kabupaten Nganjuk. USRATUNA: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam , 9(1), 38–50. https://doi.org/10.65356/usratuna.v9i1.931