OTENTISITAS REKONTRUKSI HISTORIS TRANSFORMASI HUKUM WARIS ISLAM DAVID S. POWERS
Abstract
The authenticity of the Quran and Sunnah is a controversial issue among Islamic studies scholars, and the answer to this question is a complex topic related to religious sensitivity. David Powers' research on the authenticity of the Islamic law of inheritance in his work "Studies in Qur'an and Hadith: The Formulation of the Islamic Law of Inheritance" is a fact that needs to be re-examined by investigating Powers' literature and thoughts, both pro and contra, from insiders and outsiders. Powers found differences between the law of inheritance accepted by Muhammad (Proto Islamic Law) and the Islamic Law of Inheritance. He expressed his disbelief in the sources of Islamic tradition in criticizing the interpretations of early generations. He even harshly criticized the supporting sciences of interpretation, such as the science of mansukh naskh, the science of qirā'āt, and asbāb al-nuzūl. According to him, these sciences were used to manipulate interpretations that should have been the interpretations they adopted under certain political conditions in early Islam. This article focuses on the authenticity of the historical reconstruction of the transformation of Islamic inheritance law in Powers' work, especially Proto Islamic Law and Islamic Law of Inheritance.
References
Abd al-Bāqi, Muḥammad Fu’ād, al-Mu‘jam al-Mufahras li Alfāẓ al-Qur’ān al-Karīm (Cairo: Dār al-Kutub al-Masriyyah, 1364).
‘Imarah, Muhammad, al-Tafsir al-Markisi Li al-Islam, (Kairo: Dar al-Syuruq: 1996).
‘Imarah, Muhammad, Muhammad ‘Abduh, al-A‘mal al-Kamilah, (Kairo: Dar al-Shuruq: 1993).
Abbott, Nabia, Studies in Arabic Literary Papyri II Quranic Commentary and Tradition, (Chicago: The University of Chicago press, 1967).
Abu Zaid, Nasr Hamid, Dawa’ir al-Khauf: Qira’ah fi Khitab al-Mar’ah, (Yogyakarta: PSW IAIN Sunan Kalijaga dan McGill: 2003).
Abu Zaid, Nasr Hamid, Mafhum al-Nas: Dirasah fi ‘Ulum al-Qur’an, (Beirut: Markaz al-Thaqafah al-'Arabi, 1998).
Abu Zaid, Nasr Hamid, Naqd al-Khitab al-Dini, (Kairo: Sina Li al-Nashr, 1992).
Adams, Charles J., “Islamic Religious Tradition”, dalam Leonard Binder (ed.), The Study of the Middle East: Research and Scholarship in the Humanities and the Social Sciences, (New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1976).
al-‘Amiri, Abdallah M. al-Husayn, At-Thūfi’s Refutation of Traditional Muslim Juristic Sources of Law and His View on the Priority of Regard for Human Welfare as the Highest Legal Sources or Principle (Canada: McGill University, 1993).
al-A‘ẓamī, Muḥammad Musṭāfā, Dirāsāt fī al-Ḥadīth al-Nabawī Tārīkh wa Tadwīnuh (al-Mamlakah al-‘Arabiyyah al-Su‘ūdiyyah: Wizārah al-Ta‘līm al-‘Ālī Jāmi‘ah al-Islāmiyyah bi al-Madīnah al-Munawwarah, 1430/2009).
al-A‘ẓamī, Muḥammad Musṭāfā, Manhaj al-Naqd ‘Inda al-Muḥaddithīn: Nash’atuh wa Tārīkhuh, (Riyādh: Maktabah al-Kauthar, 1410/1990).
al-Bayhāqī, Abū Bakar Aḥmad bin Ḥusayn bin ‘Alī Ahmad bin al-Husayn, al-Sunan al-Kubra, taḥqīq wa ta‘līq Muḥammad ‘Abd al-Qādir ‘Aṭā’, Vol. VI, (Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 2003).
Ali Khan, Mohammad Mustafa, Islamic Law of Inheritance: a New Approach (New Delhi: Kitab Bhavan, 1989).
al-Khāṭib, Muḥammad ‘Ajjāj, al-Sunnah Qabla al-Tadwīn (Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, 1993).
al-Nahhas, Abu Ja’far Ahmad bin Muhammad, Kitab al-Nasikh wa al-Mansukh fi al-Qur'an al-Karim, (Kairo: al-Mathba’ah al-‘alamiyyah, 1357/1938).
al-Qattan, Manna Khalil, Mabāhiṣ fi Ulūm al-Qur’ān, (Kairo: Munsarat al-‘Asr al-Hadist, 1414/1993).
al-Sibā‘ī, Musṭafā, al-Sunnah wa Makānatuha fi al-Tashrī‘ al-Islāmī (Kairo: Dār al-Qawmiyyah, 1994).
al-Suyuthi, Jalaluddin, Lubâb al-Nuqûl fî Asbâb al-Nuzûl, (Beirut: Dâr al-Fikr, 1979).
al-Tabarī, Muḥammad Ibn Jarīr, Jāmi‘ al-Bayān fī Ta’wīl al-Qur’ān, Vol. II, (Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1999).
al-Zarqani, Muhammad Abdul Adzim, Manahil al-‘Irfan fi Ulumil Qur’an, (Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, t.t.).
al-Zuhri, Abu Bakar, Nasikh Wa Mansukh fi al-Qur’an, (Kairo: Dar Ibn Affan, 2007).
Arkoun, Muḥammad, Rethingking Islam Comon Question Uncomon Answers, (Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 1996).
Azamī, Muḥammad Musṭafā, Studies in Early Ḥadīth Literature with A Critical Edition of Some Early Texts, (Beirut: al-Maktab al-Islami, 1968).
Bousquet, G. H., Les Successions Agnatiques Mitigées, (Paris: De l'Institut d'Etudes, 1935).
Brunschving, R., Le renouvellement des théories atomistiques, (France: Jolivet & Institut Catholique de Paris, 1933).
Burton, John, The Collection of The Qur’an, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977).
Coulson, Noel J., Succession in the Muslim Family, (London: Cambridge University Press, 1971).
Coulson, Noel J., A History of Islamic Law, (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1974).
Doi, A. Rahman I., Syari’ah the Islamic Law, (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2002).
Fitzgerald, S. Vesey, “Nature and Source of the Syari’ah,” dalam Law in Middle East, (Wahington: Middle East Institute, 1955).
Hasan, Ahmad, “The Theory of Naskh,” dalam Islamic Studies, Vol. 4, No. 2 (Juni 1965), 184.
Ibn Hanbal, Ahmad bin Muhammad, Musnad al-Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal, (Beirut: al-Maktab al-Islami li ath-Thaba’a wa an-Nasyr, 1969).
Ibn Kathīr, Abū al-Fidā’ Isma’īl al-Dimashqī, Tafsīr al-Qur’ān al-‘Aẓim, Vol. I, (Jeddah: Dār al-Ḥaramain, 1434/2012).
ibn Taymiyyah, Abū al-’Abbās Taqī al-Dīn Aḥmad, Majmū’ al-Fatāwā Shaikh al-Islām bin Taymiyyah, Vol. XVIII (Madinah al-Munawwarah: Majma’ Malik al-Fahd li al-Ṭibā’ah al-Mushaf al-Sharīf, 1425/2004).
Izzan, Ahmad, Ulumul Quran: Telaah Tekstual dan Kontekstuals al-Quran, (Bandung: Tafakur, 2009).
Khallaf, al-Wahhab, ‘Ilm Usul al-Fiqh, (Kairo: Dar al-‘Ilm, 1978).
Marcais, W., Des Parents et Alliés Successibles en Droit Musluman, (Université de Rennes: Faculté De Droit, Teză de Doctorat, 1898).
Powers, David S., Studies in Qur’ān and Hadīth: The Transformation of the Islamic Law of Inheritance, (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986).
Rahman, Fazlur, Islam and Modernity: Transformation of an Intellectual Tradition, (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1982).
Rahman, Fazlur, Islamic Methodology in History (New Delhi: Adam Publishers & Distributors, 1994).
Rippin, Andrew L., “The Function of Asbab al-Nuzul in Qur’anic Exegesis,” Bulletin of The school of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, Vol. 51, no. 1 (1988).
Rippin, Andrew L., The Exegetical Function of The Asbab al-Nuzul: A Bibliographical and Terminilogical Survey, dalam Bulletin of The School of Oriental and African Studies, Vol. 48, 441.
Rowi, Roem, Menafsir Ulumul Qur’an: Upaya Apresiasi Tema-Tema Pokok Ulumul Qur’an, (Sidoarjo: al-Fath Press, 2005).
Schacht, Joseph, An introduction to Islamic Law, (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984).
Schacht, Joseph, The Oigins of Muḥammadan Jurisprudence, (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1950).
Sezgir, Fuad, Geschichte des Arabichen Schrifttums, Vol. I, (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1969).
Shahrur, Muhammad, Dirasat Islamiyyah Mu’ashirah Nahwa Ushul Jadidah li al-Fiqh al-Islami, (Yogyakarta: el-SAQ Press, 2010).
Sjadzali, Munawir, “Reaktualisasi Ajaran Islam” dalam Polemik Reaktualisasi Ajaran Islam, Penyunting Iqbal Abdurrauf Saimima, (Jakarta: Pustaka Panjimas, 1988).
Smith, William Robertson, Kinship and Marriage in Early Arabia, (Cambridge: University Press, 1885).
Tekdemir, Hande, “Critical Approaches to Edward Said’s Orientalism., dalam ”Social Sciences Review of the Faculty of Sciences & Letters University of Uludag/Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 18, no. 32 (2017): 150-153.
Wansbrough, John, Quranic Studies: Sources and Methods of Scriptural Interpretation, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, I977).
Welch, Alvon T., Studies in al-Qur’an and Tafsir, dalam Journal of the American Academy of Relegion, Vol. 5, 415.
Wright, Ian, “History, Hermeneutics, Deconstruction”, dalam Jeremy Hawthorn (ed.), Criticism and Critical Theory (Baltimore: Edward Arnold, 1984).
Zahrah, Muhammad Abu, Ushul Fiqih, (Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1958).
